Making POP-2 be the command language for the operating system and the only language available to the user made it possible, on a relatively cheap computer (64K 24-bit words of memory), to support the time-shared development of quite complex programs, with relatively rapid responses to user interactions. Incorporating device handlers `cannibalised' from the earlier MiniMac project, it supported much of the symbolic computation work at Edinburgh until the early-70's.
Using a functional language with a properly implemented concept of closure is of considerable benefit in supporting the presentation of devices such as disks to a user in an encapsulated form . Multipop employed no conventional hardware protection mechanisms; instead its security was guaranteed by the fact that access to system resources was obtained via closures of device access functions, and on built in restrictions on code-generation embodied in the compiler. Being system-generated and opaque, there was way in which a user could obtain inappropriate access to system resources via these closures. Moreover, as compared with a context switch, a closure is a light-weight means of encapsulating capabilities.