%% Old style latex (latex209) form for EPSRC IRC proposal evaluation
%% Aaron Sloman 30 Jun 1999
%% Suggestions for improvement or correction welcome.
%% Email A.Sloman@cs.bham.ac.uk
%%
%% NB before filling this in you are advised to run it through latex
%% and preview it, to see what you are aiming at. Of course, some
%% sections will expand after you have written comments.
%%
\documentstyle[times]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\setlength{\textwidth}{17cm}
\setlength{\textheight}{26.5cm}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.7cm}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.7cm}
\setlength{\topmargin}{-1.5cm}
\setlength{\headheight}{0cm}
\setlength{\headsep}{0cm}
\def\RULE{\vspace*{1mm}\hrule\vspace*{2mm}}
%
%
% Abbreviations
% Horizontal space
\def\hsa{\hspace*{6mm}}
\def\hsb{\hspace*{10mm}}
%
% Vertical space
\def\VS{\vspace*{3mm}}
% Shorter vertical space
\def\vs{\vspace*{1mm}}
%
% Subsection start
\def\SUB{\VS \large \bf}
%
% This is where printable stuff starts
\begin{document}
\parindent 0cm
\parskip 2mm
{\large

This form may be photocopied and passed (unattributed) to the
investigator.

\vs

\RULE


\begin{tabbing}
%
%% Ignore the next line, used to set spacing
\bf Reference No: ~~~\= \hspace*{4.5cm} \= \bf Title: \hspace*{11mm} \= XXXXXX \= \kill
%
%% Fill in first block of XXXX with reference. Second and third with
%% project title (add extra lines if necessary)
\bf Reference No: \> XXXX       \> \bf Title: \> XXXX
\\
                  \>            \>            \> XXXX \\ %%duplicate or delete this line as needed
\\
%
%% fill in date (DDDD) and name of proposer (NNNN)
\bf Please return form by:~~ DDDD \> \> \bf Investigator:  \> NNNN \\
\\
%% Name and address of EPSRC official, and Proposer's institution
\bf To: XXXX  \>                    \> \bf Institution:  \>  XXXX \\
          \>                        \>          \> XXXX  \\ %institution can overflow
\bf IT \& Computer Science Programme \>     \> {\bf Referee reference:~} XXXX
\end{tabbing}
\RULE

%% turn off right-justification
\raggedright

{\bf RATING SUMMARY:}  Please ensure that the scores given below
are consistent with your narrative comments overleaf. EPSRC recommends
that you complete the narrative section overleaf before undertaking the
summary.

The confidence box is provided so that you can indicate your
confidence in assessing the proposal against the corresponding
criterion (H = high, M = Med, L = low)

%% Rating boxes follow.

%% Entries in the "confidence" column should use H=high, M=medium or
%% L= low.

Score on scale 1 ~ -- ~ 5, where 5 is ``internationally leading'' and 1 is
``unsatisfactory''.

\begin{center}

\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}

{\large
\begin{tabular}{|p{6.5cm}|@{\hsb}c@{\hsb}|@{\hsa}c@{\hsa}|}
\hline
&               \bf Score           &  \bf Confidence
\\
&                                   &  \bf H / M / L
\\
\hline
%
%% In each row, replace X with a number (1 -- 5) after the first "&"
%% and replace Y with H or M or L after the second "&"
%% Example:
%%\bf Scientific \& Technological Quality & 3 & H
%
%% The real entries start here:
\bf Scientific \& Technological Quality   & X & Y
\\
\hline
\bf IT-Centric Research                   & X & Y
\\
\hline
\bf Ability to undertake research         & X & Y
\\
\hline
\bf Management                            & X & Y
\\
\hline
\bf Resources                             & X & Y
\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
} %end \large

\end{center}

{\bf
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:}   please  use this space to note any additional
issues e.g. multi- disciplinarity, potential project risks. We would be
interested in any suggestions you may have for improving the project.

} %end \large
%
%% If desired, change size of font from here on by uncommenting
% one of these two
% \large
% \normalsize


\newpage
%% If desired, increase size of font from here on by changing to \large
\normalsize

{\normalsize
This form may be photocopied and passed unattributed to the
investigator.}

{\SUB
1.  SCIENTIFIC \& TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY}\\
{\sc Give your opinion on likely quality of the research proposed,
including its novelty, the breadth of vision, its imagination
 and the nature of the interdisciplinarity.}


{\sc How will the programme affect the target area?}

{\sc What are the potential benefits?}

{\SUB
2.  IT-CENTRIC RESEARCH}\\
{\sc To what extent does the proposal relate research in
IT to advances in other disciplines.}


{\SUB
3.  ABILITY TO UNDERTAKE THE RESEARCH}\\
{\sc Your opinion on the quality and standing of the applicants
and their collaborators and the appropriateness of the proposed
collaboration for the programme proposed.}


{\SUB
4.  MANAGEMENT}
\\
{\sc How will the collaboration cohere? Are the arrangements
proposed likely to deliver the promised collaborations}

{\SUB
5.  RESOURCES}
\\
{\sc In broad terms are these appropriate to the scientific promise?}


\end{document}
