REVIEWING INSTRUCTIONS
(Last updated: 28 Jan 2010)

Please use the template to complete each review, and return it as
a plain text file by email addressed to aiib10@cs.bham.ac.uk,
preferably by 7th Feb 2010 or soon after.

If you write your template using a word-processor package, e.g.
OpenOffice or MSWord, please save it as a plain text file (.txt) and
send that.

It will be helpful if you give the template file a name that is
composed of your surname and the paper/poster reference, e.g.

    smith-pa8.txt

The template includes fields that can be copied from the information
sent in this message about the paper or poster abstract.

Where the template includes optional answers to a question, please
delete all but one, or specify an alternative answer if you wish.

Please delete instructions from the template when you fill it in.

===================================================================

To: aiib10@cs.bham.ac.uk,
Subject: Review for AIIB Paper/Poster REF:

TEMPLATE FOR REVIEW.TXT FILE:

REVIEWER'S NAME:

EMAIL:

===================================

POSTER REF: or PAPER REF:

TITLE OF PAPER OR POSTER:

AUTHORS:

REVIEW:

PART 1: For authors and symposium organisers:

1.1. Is the submission relevant to the aims of the symposium:
     (See next question for types of relevance.)

        very,
        slightly,
        no

1.2 What sort of contribution does it make?
e.g.
    presenting a computational explanation or model of biological
    phenomena

    presenting AI/Robotics-inspired questions requiring
    biological research.

    discussing, criticising, evaluating previous theory/theories
    from an AI/Robotics standpoint

    discussing methodology for research in cognition from
    AI/Robotics standpoint

    Other

    See also
    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/aiib/priorities.html

1.3a If it is a paper submission:

    Should it be accepted for presentation at the symposium?

        Yes definitely,

        Maybe, if the programme is not too full.

        No, but it could be presented as a poster
        (plus paper in the proceedings)

        Not worth including in any form.

1.3.b If it is a poster submission:

    Should it be accepted ?

        Yes definitely,

        No

        Don't know

        Should it be offered as a full presentation if
        there's time?
            Yes
            No
            Don't know

1.4 Please write comments to be sent to the authors, suggesting
improvements, gaps to be filled, points to be clarified,
relevant publications, etc.

    If you wish the authors to know who you are, please include your
    name, and, if you wish, your email address.


===================================

PART 2: Comments for organisers only

    If you wish all your comments to go to the authors please put them
    in the preceding section. Anything in this section will not be
    forwarded.

===================================================================